News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MIT abandons use of DEI statements by _heimdall on Monday May 06, 2024 @07:04AM (#40273253)
Because measuring diversity of thought is much more difficult, and thought isn't a legally protected class.
Re:MIT abandons use of DEI statements by commandlinefan on Monday May 06, 2024 @02:16PM (#40277743)
> thought isn't a legally protected

So the law justifies the law?

Re:MIT abandons use of DEI statements by _heimdall on Monday May 06, 2024 @03:10PM (#40278334)
All I meant was that all companies ultimately care about is what is legally required, everything else ends up just being lip service and PR.

To your question though, the law justifies the law unfortunately. That's one big reason I'm opposed to laws and government in general. Something is legal because we said its legal, or more often its legal because a prior generation said it was legal. Put worse, something is punishable because we once wrote down that you would be punished for a specific act.