News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon Web Services signature version 1 is insecure by kirse on Thursday December 18, 2008 @02:08PM (#402471)
Thanks! I understand the Amazon vulnerability fully, I was just referring to my own web-app development.

It's not an issue though because I don't do the key/value pair splitting as they do.

Re:Amazon Web Services signature version 1 is insecure by tptacek on Thursday December 18, 2008 @02:09PM (#402473)
Why are you "signing" your data at all? You're doing it wrong. Use SSL to secure the whole transport; use form or HTTP auth to make sure you know who you're talking to.
Re:Amazon Web Services signature version 1 is insecure by cperciva on Thursday December 18, 2008 @03:32PM (#402607)
Signing requests with an HMAC provides end-to-end authentication, which is vastly superior to transport-level authentication such as HTTP auth.
Re:Amazon Web Services signature version 1 is insecure by tptacek on Thursday December 18, 2008 @04:47PM (#402681)
You skipped the HTTPS part of my recommendation, which is vastly superior to homebrewed HMAC.
Re:Amazon Web Services signature version 1 is insecure by cperciva on Thursday December 18, 2008 @04:51PM (#402686)
HTTPS is irrelevant to what I said. End-to-end authentication is better than transport-level authentication. Using an HMAC to sign requests and then sending those signed requests over HTTPS is better than using HTTP auth over HTTPS.
Re:Amazon Web Services signature version 1 is insecure by tptacek on Thursday December 18, 2008 @04:56PM (#402691)
Yes, but what you said is irrelevant to what I said, and so we are at an impasse. =)