Re:The Stripper Index: An unorthodox recession measurement
by blululu on Thursday May 02, 2024 @01:31PM
(#40238933)
You’re talking past the point I made. Losses weigh heavier than gains in human psychology. This is a pretty robust finding. Inflation necessarily means losses for everyone. These can be offset but people don’t necessarily come away feeling good about it. You can say that on average people are better off after the reshuffle (though not necessarily everyone), but even if wages are universally up people will not necessarily feel good about it.
Re:The Stripper Index: An unorthodox recession measurement
by ethbr1 on Thursday May 02, 2024 @04:11PM
(#40240872)
> Inflation necessarily means losses for everyone.
This is the thing you're disagreeing with parent on, because it's not true if you can afford to hold the assets that are inflating.
Inflation doesn't happen in a vacuum: it's inflation-in-terms-of-____.
If you happen to own a lot of ____, because you have disposable income and can afford to invest, then your net worth "inflates" too.
Simple example: how does inflation of the price of gasoline at the pump impact you, if you own a refinery and a filling station? Certainly not in the same way it does to someone who owns neither and commutes to work daily in an ICE vehicle.
Increases in asset prices spurn consumer spending in wealthier households relative to their proportion of assets owned - the top 10% of households own 62% of the assets.[2]
[1]https://apnews.com/article/inflation-economy-wealth-rates-fe...
[2]https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/dfa/distr...