Re:US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana
by kelseyfrog on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @07:32PM
(#40230913)
Judging people is wrong. This isn't a controversial statement.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana
by eurleif on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @07:35PM
(#40230936)
"Wrong" is a judgment. Why are you judging people for judging people?
Re:US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana
by kelseyfrog on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @09:19PM
(#40231716)
If you're arguing that judging people is ok, I think you could do a better job than tu quoque.
Re:US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana
by eurleif on Thursday May 02, 2024 @01:25AM
(#40232967)
"You judged someone on a separate occasion, so you can't object to judging people now" would be tu quoque. What I actually did was point out the internal contradiction in your stated position.
Re:US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana
by kelseyfrog on Thursday May 02, 2024 @08:53PM
(#40242930)
Sorry, I just don't think that arguing that it's ok to judge people is viable. It seems to be very important to you, however.
Re:US drug control agency will move to reclassify marijuana
by eurleif on Thursday May 02, 2024 @09:20PM
(#40243064)
I've said a total of four sentences on the matter, none of which hinted at its importance or lack thereof to me, so it's interesting that you've come to that conclusion. Either way, my internal motivations are a non sequitur. You are continuing to take a self-contradictory position by stating that a certain behavior, namely judgment, is not "ok", which constitutes a judgment. You have offered no defense of doing so. Should I conclude that you simply believe that oxymoronic positions can in fact be correct?