News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The AWS S3 Denial of Wallet Amplification Attack by vermilingua on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @05:58PM (#40230048)
Then subsequent requests that hit the cache shouldn’t be charged by that logic.
Re:The AWS S3 Denial of Wallet Amplification Attack by slt2021 on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @06:04PM (#40230114)
s3 is a complex system, you could be hitting a different node with subsequent requests where this cache entry does not exist yet.

if you think egress is expensive, well storing data in RAM for cache purposes is 1000000x more expensive

a lot of stuff could be happening. Main problem is AWS (i think) is charging for egress out of S3 system, but customers are looking at their ingress at client side and there is mismatch

Re:The AWS S3 Denial of Wallet Amplification Attack by jpambrun on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @08:07PM (#40231208)
But you are not charged if it's not Internet egress, which makes your argument about compute/ram cost moot.