This is the tone I'm asking about. I just don't understand why you insinuate things instead of saying them outright.

Though to answer more directly: I someone come across as a bit supersilious, partly because of big words, complex sentences, & assuming people understand, and sometimes because I just am.

> neofetch is dead; here's my fork

< there exists already a maintained fork -- ``hyfetch"

> hyfetch explicitly inserts lgbtq+ things into the software, and thus is probably not what people want when they think ``maintained neofetch fork"

seems perfectly reasonable.

But that isn't all that the (now flagged and hidden so I can't evidence this) post I was replying to said more, and a small essay elsewhere in the thread (also flagged and hidden) said more again (or repeated the same things in more ways, to be less generous).

Even if they did exist, the /explicit/ point being made is valid: hyfetch is an expressly lgbt thing, and a lot (most?) people would prefer their vanity-specification-printer wasn't intertwined with that kind of thing.

It would be like learning the currently maintained version of grep includes random Christian iconography, if that helps the point get across -- christian or not, that's not what people go to software for, and it would thus be pretty useless to mention christGrep in a discussion about maintained alternatives to the original.

Why do you accuse me of not being calm?

No, but your posts did seem to strongly imply you were carefully not saying some things.

> Why do you accuse me of not being calm?

Because short essays that amount to “as long as I don't have to see it” are, in my experience, not associated with a calm demeanour. I may have made an unfair assumption there.

Even if I have, the rest of that line is still relevant: “have fun being you, and let others have their fun being them”.