Hey, I meant no dissing at Zephyr, i hope it was clear.
What i wanted to get across is that claims about "Posix compliance" might have wide variance in meaningfulness unless backed by a certification.
What i wanted to get across is that claims about "Posix compliance" might have wide variance in meaningfulness unless backed by a certification.
The work is still in progress. It's also important to note, that Zephyr is intended to run on resource-constrained systems. There is not much logic in implementing fork() for example, since technically, there is only one process. So it implements a subset of the interface. Here is the link to the talk from the EOSS 2024 where Chris Friedt shares the current state of POSIX support in Zephyr: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLnmXxXuS6w