News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Project Habbakuk: Britain's Ice "Bergship" Aircraft Carri... by KineticLensman on Tuesday April 30, 2024 @10:10AM (#40211112)
> I'm even less an admiral or air marshall but I dont see any tactical or strategic advantage here either.

Not disagreeing with your main points at all, but from a strat/tac point of view, up until later in the war, there was an air gap in the Atlantic where German U-Boats didn't have to worry about a significant air threat from the Allies. A large airfield parked mid-Atlantic might have significantly improved Allied air coverage, and helped reduce the stunningly bad shipping losses they were experiencing.

Re:Project Habbakuk: Britain's Ice "Bergship" Aircraft Carri... by pfdietz on Tuesday April 30, 2024 @10:50AM (#40211560)
Ultimately, the US made something like 122 escort carriers, which enabled all convoys to have air cover.
Re:Project Habbakuk: Britain's Ice "Bergship" Aircraft Carri... by KineticLensman on Tuesday April 30, 2024 @11:44AM (#40212329)
Exactly, and we also developed longer range aircraft and better anti-U-Boat weaponry. Hence my observation regarding the air gap that existed earlier in the war (not that the bergship would have been ready then)