News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FCC fines largest wireless carriers for sharing location ... by immibis on Monday April 29, 2024 @07:23PM (#40205379)
This is mostly unenforced, as it WAS ruled that it must be as easy to reject as to accept. However, they're going after "consent to ads or buy a subscription" which I thought was a pretty fair compromise business model.
Re:FCC fines largest wireless carriers for sharing location ... by Maarten88 on Monday April 29, 2024 @07:41PM (#40205543)
I'm generally okay with Ads, that is fair. But I'm not okay with tracking, consolidating data about me from different sources, analyzing it and selling that. It is too hard to understand how that may impact me and others.
Re:FCC fines largest wireless carriers for sharing location ... by ethbr1 on Monday April 29, 2024 @09:26PM (#40206298)
Imho, the problem with "consent to ads or buy a subscription" is that it becomes the new CableCARD [0].

I.e. all companies really want to be in the business of tracking customers, because they can repackage derivative products and increase their revenue.

So the "subscription" option ends up experiencing a lack of support, mysterious technical issues, underinvestment, etc.

End result, customers don't choose it, which businesses use to lobby for further eroding mandates.

You can't force a company to provide and support a product they don't want to. You can force them to turn one off.

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CableCARD