It’s about effective interventions. Obviously major interventions are needed as there is a huge amount of obese and overweight in the US and many other methods have been attempted.
It’s not about theoretically possible (ie, a bodybuilder can do it) but effective population interventions that result in people successfully losing weight.
Think about people going to medical school and becoming a doctor. It’s obviously possible but if you said the solution to income inequality was for everyone to go to medical school and be doctors that would not be a very effective intervention.
Not being obese is not being wealthy. It’s simple what to do, but difficult to stick to a successful plan.
Etc etc
Life is full of things that are supposedly easy, but yet people don’t do them. I think it’s reductive to just stick with ineffectual interventions that aren’t being used because they seem simple and people should just adjust.
Saying “Japan (4.5%) can do it so Germany (19%) should stop being so fat” isn’t very helpful. [0]
The goal is to reduce obesity. It’s not like we can’t also attempt systemic changes while also using ozempic.
If you’re saying we shouldn’t use ozempic because other methods should work (but haven’t in many countries), then that’s a pretty simplistic argument. And one that will likely result in greater obesity and societal harm.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_obesity_r...
One of the reasons I referenced other countries was because it provides very strong evidence that culture is a factor. In America, we presently have a culture of telling ourselves that it's really hard to keep excessive amounts of weight off. We betray ourselves every time we tell that lie.