News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Made Me Ruin a Perfectly Good Website by WarOnPrivacy on Sunday April 28, 2024 @01:42AM (#40186289)
> Google says "hey, unfortunately your site isn't appealing to advertisers."

1) Advertisers - plural? What other advertisers is Google referencing?

In this context, 'advertisers' means all the other meaningfully similar ad options that the author could choose from.

2) This wording: "The team has reviewed it but unfortunately your site isn’t ready to show ads at this time." is Google's clear and blatant refusal to extend their ad ~monopoly to his web page. A refusal that gets satisfied only after he loads his site up with useless, time wasting crap.

I'll grant the author did have a choice. The author could be denied access to Google's ad monopoly or he could crap up his web page.

Re:Google Made Me Ruin a Perfectly Good Website by bitnasty on Sunday April 28, 2024 @07:46AM (#40187885)
Advertisers are the ones paying to have their ads shown. Google is not an advertiser in this context.
Re:Google Made Me Ruin a Perfectly Good Website by WarOnPrivacy on Sunday April 28, 2024 @01:33PM (#40190237)
You are correct. And your observation is useful.

It helps clarify that Google is lying - by pretending advertisers actively desire webpages that are unreadably overloaded with pap.