Re:Camus, Albert and the Anarchists (2007)
by keybored on Saturday April 27, 2024 @02:12PM
(#40182129)
Para 1: If this refers to “Tyranny of Structurelessness” (maybe that was just feminism) then modern anarchism has plenty of structure. If not: I guess it doesn’t work.
Para 2: It would be great if we would get to a point where we have to live up to these high-minded ideals. Like if pacifism is possible.[1] Meanwhile these “what if an unstoppable anarchist met an immovable anarchist” thought experiments aren’t interesting.
[1] Not that pacifism is an anarchist position. So relevance?
Para 2: It would be great if we would get to a point where we have to live up to these high-minded ideals. Like if pacifism is possible.[1] Meanwhile these “what if an unstoppable anarchist met an immovable anarchist” thought experiments aren’t interesting.
[1] Not that pacifism is an anarchist position. So relevance?