Re:Brutalist Churches
by djur on Saturday April 27, 2024 @12:17AM
(#40177179)
I don't see it that way at all. A lot of care and thought went into these designs, and they evoke the kind of awe you would expect from a god's house. These aren't just hulking concrete bunkers like some of the institutional brutalism you see.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Maybe these architects should think, why their "well thought" experiments just look lazy designed.
They don't. Are you telling me that you look at this and think "what a lazy design"?
https://static.dezeen.com/uploads/2024/04/sacred-modernity-b...
30 seconds of Google search
https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/wp-content/uploads/2020...
You think this is well thought.
That isn't one of the buildings we were talking about. Indeed, in the post you responded to, I contrasted them with
> hulking concrete bunkers like some of the institutional brutalism you see.
Please make more thoughtful responses in the future.
We were generally talking about brutalism and I searched shortly about sloppy designed example (besides many real life example I am unlucky forced to see)
Please think more next why people disagree with your opinion. Also see it as a hind to be more thoughtful why brutalism is so unpopular.
Re:Brutalist Churches
by matthewmacleod on Sunday April 28, 2024 @05:16PM
(#40192027)
Yeah, I mean it seems to me you just searched for some random picture and made literally no commentary about it. It looks completely fine.
I always find it weird when people have this „everyone hates it“ attitude with no real commentary whatsoever.