Re:Dedoimedo reviews Wayland in 2024 and comes to sad conclu...
by Vilian on Thursday April 25, 2024 @07:22AM
(#40156074)
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mstoeckl/waypipe
here, found the wayland network transparency, fix your comment
Re:Dedoimedo reviews Wayland in 2024 and comes to sad conclu...
by znpy on Thursday April 25, 2024 @01:43PM
(#40160704)
Not officially supported, irrelevant
Re:Dedoimedo reviews Wayland in 2024 and comes to sad conclu...
by orangeboats on Thursday April 25, 2024 @02:11PM
(#40161066)
If you have known the structure of the Wayland protocol before making the comment, you'd know that "official support" is a red herring.
The only official thing provided by the Wayland project (other than the protocols themselves described in XML) is the wayland-server and wayland-client library pair, which is more or less just a serializer and deserializer of the protocol.
There is also Weston, but we don't talk about it.
Waypipe is about as official as Kwin, Mutter or wlroots, and yet we don't disregard those projects as being irrelevant due to their unofficial status.
Re:Dedoimedo reviews Wayland in 2024 and comes to sad conclu...
by phendrenad2 on Monday May 06, 2024 @04:25AM
(#40272438)
> "official support" is a red herring
That sounds like a bad thing, no? ;)
Re:Dedoimedo reviews Wayland in 2024 and comes to sad conclu...
by zamalek on Thursday April 25, 2024 @12:58PM
(#40160020)
There are maybe five people in the world that care about network transparency (an exaggeration, but probably not more than 2 magnitudes of order off). X11 was built for every scenario conceivable. Wayland is being built for end-user thick devices. What you decide not to do is more important than what you decide to do.
And some dedicated soul managed to get it working anyway, as a sibling comment has pointed out.
So meh, you give and you take, life is a compromise.