Re:Meta does everything OpenAI should be
by JoshTriplett on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @08:07AM
(#40143387)
We can do more than one thing at a time. (Or, more to the point, different people can do different things.) We can advocate against misuses of current capabilities, and advocate about the much larger threats of future capabilities.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Meta does everything OpenAI should be
by flappyeagle on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @08:25AM
(#40143533)
We really can’t. We are terrible at multitasking.
Re:Meta does everything OpenAI should be
by williamcotton on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @09:12AM
(#40143979)
If you look around you’ll see that there are indeed very many people who are doing very different things from one another and without much centralized coordination.
Parent is likely referring to political/mass pressure behind initiatives.
In which case the lack of a clear singular message, when confronted with a determined and amoral adversary, dissolves into confusion.
Most classically, because the adversary plants PR behind "It's still an open debate among experts."
See: cigarettes, climate change
There's a big fucking difference between people who want to regulate AI because they might become a doomsday terminator paperclip factory (the register-model-with-government-if-they-are-too-big-crowd) and the folks who want to prevent AI being used to indirectly discriminate in hiring and immigration.