The death of the 60/40 portfolio

Re:The death of the 60/40 portfolio by throw0101d on Tuesday April 23, 2024 @03:38PM (#40136265)

> A slight over simplification, for example s&p was negative 1% per year from Jan 2000 to Dec 2009. Plus the cost of your leverage.

For the 2000s, a US-only investor would only have been saved from the S&P500 by having at least 20% bonds and rebalancing:

* https://www.forbes.com/sites/advisor/2010/09/13/its-not-real...

Of course if you were not US-only, but rather internationally diversified (and rebalanced), you would also have been fine. Diversification is important, even for Americans (cited sources in the description):

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FXuMs6YRCY

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The death of the 60/40 portfolio by nuclearnice1 on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @07:54AM (#40143277)

Thanks for the great video on international diversification.

I noticed he has another on the related topic of bias toward investing in one’s home country.

https://youtu.be/qYedjI03Q0g?si=-wOqSA96cmScFInq

[ Parent | on HN ]