News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The death of the 60/40 portfolio by toomuchtodo on Tuesday April 23, 2024 @02:59PM (#40135793)
Most target date funds are invested up to 80-90% in equities early in their life, with the remainder being bonds and short term (cash) investments. The re-allocation to bonds as the target date is approached (at which point the fund converts to a terminal income fund) is to reduce equity volatility and sequence of return risk (ie maximize growth exposure when it can be tolerated, reduce exposure as risk tolerance declines due to approaching income need).

We'd all like to capture maximum risk adjusted returns, but compromises must be made depending on your desired outcome and constraints.

Re:The death of the 60/40 portfolio by ldjkfkdsjnv on Tuesday April 23, 2024 @03:20PM (#40136051)
This is too conservative and isnt helping people, you will work for your whole life with this investment plan and a regular income
Re:The death of the 60/40 portfolio by toomuchtodo on Tuesday April 23, 2024 @03:22PM (#40136072)
Neither is having a portfolio take losses you can't tolerate unless you die and someone inherits it (with recovery happening while they're holding it). If the problem is that investors don't have enough cashflow over their working years to assemble a balanced portfolio that will comfortably carry them to death, that is a different issue. Reaching for risky yield is a lottery ticket.

If you maximize equity exposure too high, too long, you will potentially get blown out of the water. Broadly speaking, at some point, gains must be locked in and invested somewhere less risky (assuming your average person investing to retire).

https://archive.nytimes.com/screenshots/www.nytimes.com/inte...

https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011...