Re:LLVM 3.1 released
by program on Wednesday May 23, 2012 @04:15AM
(#4012074)
Collections subscripting operator [] and boxed C strings are life-savers. Instantiating obj-c object is always a pain cause the syntax is very verbose, expecially for NSString:
it's 11 characters vs 67. Now what I really, really miss is the implementation of the NSString concatenation operator. stringWithFormat isn't always the answer nor appendString. Please forgive me if you find that my idea is silly:
Or maybe some concise dictionary operators.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I think that would be inconsistent. All existing @<whatever> fragments are evaluated at compile-time. Your @+, @|, @&, @^ feel more appropriate as proper functions (the compiler could still know of them, so it could optimize calls away)
Also: dictionary merge/intersect/difference aren't easily defined. For example, what should
@&( @{ @"a":@"aye", @"b":@"bee" }, @{ @"a":@"ai ai", @"Bee":@"bee" })
return?I don't like it, mainly because it spreads the at-sign too far, and the result is a cornucopia of dense, unreadable at-signs. When you want to do thinks like dictionary operations, I'd prefer to have the intent clearly spelled out in the code.