News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Incident: Swiss A333 at New York, rejected takeoff due to... by toomuchtodo on Sunday April 21, 2024 @09:24PM (#40110724)
> Or is a large scale disaster the only way to make people understand the urgency?

Yes. And a controller is going to get scapegoated (likely ruining their life) when a few hundred people die in the process, versus the failing system.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/02/business/air-traffic-cont... | https://archive.today/bFcAh

(Obviously, I would rather be wrong about this)

Re:Incident: Swiss A333 at New York, rejected takeoff due to... by stevepeg on Sunday April 21, 2024 @10:36PM (#40111012)
> But The Times found that the combination of six-day workweeks and round-the-clock schedules has caused controllers to develop physical and mental health problems. Many avoid seeking professional help because doing so might jeopardize the medical clearances they need to work.

This is happening frequently to pilots and cabin crew as well, all over the world. Regulators have allowed a lot of flex in rostering in recent years, maybe a bit too much.

Re:Incident: Swiss A333 at New York, rejected takeoff due to... by WorkerBee28474 on Sunday April 21, 2024 @09:49PM (#40110831)
> Obviously, I would rather be wrong about this

No, you're right, this is a common procedure across industries

Re:Incident: Swiss A333 at New York, rejected takeoff due to... by yongjik on Monday April 22, 2024 @12:54AM (#40111501)
Two planes collided in LAX in 1991 due to what was clearly a controller error, killing 35. Investigators decided that anyone could have made such a mistake given circumstances. The controller wasn't punished, and instead a bunch of changes were made to prevent similar situations in the future.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_runway_disaster

Obviously it would be ideal if such changes are made before planes collide, but the US air accident investigation system generally does its job, as far as I've heard.