Dehydrated: Letsencrypt/acme client implemented as a shell-script

Re:Dehydrated: Letsencrypt/acme client implemented as a shel... by candiddevmike on Saturday April 20, 2024 @09:14AM (#40097142)

I'm a simple man, I see a comment complaining about snap and I automatically upvote.

It's 2024. If you're still distributing snaps as the preferred method of install, you're alienating your users. AppImage, Flatpak, and regular containers are all far better deployment options.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dehydrated: Letsencrypt/acme client implemented as a shel... by groestl on Saturday April 20, 2024 @09:52AM (#40097373)

> If you're still distributing snaps as the preferred method of install, you're alienating your users.

Dropped lxd because of it. Now I hear they're a proper debian package, but that decision was so weird (especially the auto-update part) I don't trust them anymore.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dehydrated: Letsencrypt/acme client implemented as a shel... by eyegor on Saturday April 20, 2024 @12:00PM (#40098320)

I wish everything in linux land just had an AUR equivalent.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dehydrated: Letsencrypt/acme client implemented as a shel... by johnisgood on Saturday April 20, 2024 @09:25AM (#40097194)

Same. I have a couple of comments as to why snap is awful.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dehydrated: Letsencrypt/acme client implemented as a shel... by blackfawn on Saturday April 20, 2024 @11:08AM (#40097946)

I wish I could upvote this more... snaps are the worst!

[ Parent | on HN ]