Re:'Irresponsible' to ignore consciousness across animal wor...
by shishy on Friday April 19, 2024 @08:15PM
(#40093267)
Just because someone has an internal monologue doesnt mean they think slow. Its just a voice in your head you can talk to. Its not how you think.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:'Irresponsible' to ignore consciousness across animal wor...
by gnulinux on Friday April 19, 2024 @08:21PM
(#40093307)
It can also be how you think. I think like that (speaking to myself) and I'm not a slow thinker, at least I don't think so... The thing is, when speaking doesn't involve muscle movements, and just a stream of word/concept objects it can be much faster, and also doesn't have to be single-threaded (so to say). But from my subjective experience it feels like I'm talking to myself, one word after the other.
Re:'Irresponsible' to ignore consciousness across animal wor...
by neom on Saturday April 20, 2024 @12:41AM
(#40094871)
I think this is probably how I work too, and people tell me I think very quickly, so I suppose that means I can just talk to myself faster than whatever they are doing, hah. If you don't mind me asking, how are you with math? My mind completely lacks a framework for numbers, so I'm unable to do math (I feel like that might sound insane).
Re:'Irresponsible' to ignore consciousness across animal wor...
by jochem9 on Saturday April 20, 2024 @03:04AM
(#40095447)
Not who you replied to, but I can relate.
I'm not great at math, but I've trained myself to do basic calculations in my head. I need to concentrate hard and it goes very slow (I'm also a fast thinker for other stuff). I do this because it's a very useful skill in day-to-day life, so worth training.
I once read that many people basically spin up a virtual machine in their mind to do math. That is how it feels to me too. All simulation, no hardware acceleration, so very slow.
Re:'Irresponsible' to ignore consciousness across animal wor...
by neom on Saturday April 20, 2024 @10:21AM
(#40097529)
I'm really curious what people who are good at math are actually doing. I presume my thinking methodologies are just so far removed from how they think that I'm unable to imagine it, I can hardly even visualize a number never mind manipulate them, it's strange. I couldn't tell time till I was in my early teens, and even then it was a lot of work, and even today I wouldn't exactly call it "automatic".
Re:'Irresponsible' to ignore consciousness across animal wor...
by tomrod on Saturday April 20, 2024 @04:56PM
(#40100935)
I was like you for awhile. Was good with with arithmetic but not much more than that. After learning a handful of new languages via total immersion, I found I could learn math much more deeply!
Re:'Irresponsible' to ignore consciousness across animal wor...
by WalterSear on Friday April 19, 2024 @11:08PM
(#40094406)
I find listening to podcasts at 1.25-1.5x much easier. I noticed that this speed is much more in line with my internal dialogue.
I also noticed that I need to speed up female speakers more than males. I'm not sure if this is because their cadence tends to be slower, or if it's something about me.