News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol. Parent comment

Re:Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol by mattgreenrocks on Friday April 19, 2024 @10:14AM (#40087095)
Just commenting to say I really appreciate your business model. Whereas most businesses actively seek to build moats to maintain competitive advantage and locking people in, actions like this paint a different picture of Supabase. I'll be swapping out the API my app uses for Supabase storage to switch it to an S3 API this weekend in case I ever need to switch it.

My only real qualm at this point is mapping JS entities using the JS DB API makes it hard to use camelcase field names due to PG reasons I can't recall. I'm not sure what a fix for that would look like.

Keep up the good work.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol by kiwicopple on Saturday April 20, 2024 @06:21AM (#40096222)
> mapping JS entities using the JS DB API makes it hard to use camelcase field names due to PG reasons I can't recall

Postgres requires you to "quoteCamelCase". There are some good JS libs to map between snake case and camel case. FWIW, I like a mix of both in my code: snake_case indicates it's a database property, and camelCase indicates its a JS property. Try it out - it might grow on you :)

[ Parent | on HN ]