News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol. Parent comment

Re:Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol by pbronez on Friday April 19, 2024 @09:02AM (#40086289)
I’m confused about what directions this goes.

The announcement is that Supabase now supports (user) —s3 protocol—> (Supabase)

Above you say that (Supabase) —Supabase S3 Driver—> (AWS S3)

Are you further saying that that (Supabase) —Supabase S3 Driver—> (any S3 compatible storage provider) ? If so, how does the user configure that?

It seems more likely that you mean that for any application with the architecture (user) —s3 protocol—> (any S3 compatible storage provider), Supabase can now be swapped in as that storage target.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol by nemothekid on Friday April 19, 2024 @05:06PM (#40091892)
As I understand it, supabase is open source. So the hosted supabase is

(user) -> s3 protocol -> (Supabase) -> (AWS S3)

you could fork (or contribute) a database driver for any s3 compatible backend of choice.

(user) -> s3 protocl -> (pbronez-base) -> (GCP Cloud Storage)

[ Parent | on HN ]