Re:Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol
by paradite on Friday April 19, 2024 @06:32AM
(#40085088)
I think Vercel and Next.js are built by the same group of people, the same people who made Now.sh, started the company (Zeit), then changed product name to Now.sh, then changed company and product name to Vercel.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol
by cqqxo4zV46cp on Friday April 19, 2024 @07:30AM
(#40085473)
Yes. That doesn’t mean that they haven’t ran it into the ground.
Re:Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol
by paradite on Friday April 19, 2024 @09:00AM
(#40086269)
Tell me about it.
My simple SSG Next.js static site loads much slower than my Jekyll site on GitHub pages.
And I can't figure out how to improve its speed or disable the "ISG" feature that I believe is to be blamed for the poor performance.
Re:Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol
by eropple on Friday April 19, 2024 @09:08AM
(#40086351)
Not defending NextJS, I'm pretty out on it myself, but ISG requires a server to run. It pregenerates static content for defined pages and serves that until revalidating. If you've built a fully static bundle, nothing exists that would handle that incremental/revalidating logic.
Re:Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol
by paradite on Friday April 19, 2024 @11:12AM
(#40087810)
I understand that ISG requires a server (Node.js runtime) to run it, that's why I want to disable it for my SSG Next.js static site, but I can't figure out how. I just want static hosting like S3+Cloudfront which is much faster.
Re:Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol
by theturtletalks on Friday April 19, 2024 @11:30AM
(#40088076)
You need to use static export:
https://nextjs.org/docs/app/building-your-application/deploy...