News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meta Llama 3 by selcuka on Thursday April 18, 2024 @07:43PM (#40081901)
I'm seeing the same behaviour. It's as if they have a post-processor that evaluates the quality of the response after a certain number of tokens have been generated, and reverts the response if it's below a threshold.
Re:Meta Llama 3 by dhon_ on Thursday April 18, 2024 @08:11PM (#40082081)
I've noticed Gemini exhibiting similar behaviour. It will start to answer, for example, a programming question - only to delete the answer and replace it with something along the lines of "I'm only a language model, I don't know how to do that"
Re:Meta Llama 3 by flakiness on Thursday April 18, 2024 @08:32PM (#40082208)
The linked article mentions these safeguards as the post-processing step.
Re:Meta Llama 3 by visarga on Friday April 19, 2024 @02:21AM (#40083924)
They have both pre and post-LLM filters.
Re:Meta Llama 3 by baby on Friday April 19, 2024 @04:53AM (#40084613)
Always very frustrating when it happens.
Re:Meta Llama 3 by extraduder_ire on Friday April 19, 2024 @07:55AM (#40085675)
This seems like a bizarre way to handle this. Unless there's some level of malicious compliance, I don't see why they wouldn't just hide the output until the filtering step is completed. Maybe they're incredibly concerned about it appearing responsive in the average case.

Would not be surprised if there were browser extensions/userscripts to keep a copy of the text when it gets deleted and mark it as such.

Re:Meta Llama 3 by Breza on Saturday April 20, 2024 @10:56PM (#40102832)
I've seen the exact same thing! Gemini put together an impressive bash one liner then deleted it.
Re:Meta Llama 3 by chupchap on Thursday April 18, 2024 @08:57PM (#40082388)
It might be copyright related and not quality related. What if X% of it is a direct ripoff an existing song?