News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sony FW900 Widescreen CRT Trinitron by Aurornis on Wednesday April 17, 2024 @05:15PM (#40070107)
> The core argument for CRT's is their low latency and high refresh rate

The article is outdated (like you said) because LCD/OLED displays have long since surpassed CRTs in latency and refresh rate.

A modern gaming LCD can refresh the entire screen multiple times over before an old CRT scans the entire frame and returns to the top to redraw the next one.

Re:Sony FW900 Widescreen CRT Trinitron by remlov on Wednesday April 17, 2024 @07:06PM (#40071037)
Point being? Your modern LCD still uses buffers and sample and hold. They will always have inherent input latency compared to CRT regardless how fast they can refresh.
Re:Sony FW900 Widescreen CRT Trinitron by Brananarchy on Thursday April 18, 2024 @02:20AM (#40073482)
They will have inherent _output_ latency.
Re:Sony FW900 Widescreen CRT Trinitron by KennyBlanken on Wednesday April 17, 2024 @07:04PM (#40071016)
Yeah, and 90% of the commenters in this discussion clearly haven't looked at TV or computer monitor made in the last few years; they're at least 5 years behind the market.

There are Samsung TVs that have around ~6ms input delay, and many, many gaming monitors have 1-2ms input delay.

If you spend $400 you can get a 1440p monitor with 1ms input delay, 2-3ms grey-to-grey timing, that will do 240hz.

All with more contrast, color gamut, and resolution.