Re:Justice Department to file antitrust suit against Live Na...
by hervature on Tuesday April 16, 2024 @06:37PM
(#40058152)
The scalper is trading volatility (they may or may not sell the ticket for a higher price) for the opportunity of a return. The venue is getting the opposite side of the deal. Guaranteed income now.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Justice Department to file antitrust suit against Live Na...
by crabmusket on Tuesday April 16, 2024 @09:26PM
(#40059407)
But if, on average, scalpers didn't get their payout, then they wouldn't take the risk right? Unless scalpers as a class are economically irrational?
Re:Justice Department to file antitrust suit against Live Na...
by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday April 16, 2024 @10:09PM
(#40059673)
> if, on average, scalpers didn't get their payout, then they wouldn't take the risk
The point is they can get their pay-out while the venue/artist and consumers win. Scalper gets paid. Venue and artist get stability. Consumer who buys from the scalper gets availability. And the other 90% of consumers get cheaper prices.
Re:Justice Department to file antitrust suit against Live Na...
by crabmusket on Wednesday April 17, 2024 @12:40AM
(#40060483)
I see, I guess that makes sense in theory.