Refuting Bloomberg's analysis: ChatGPT isn't racist, but it is bad at recruiting

Re:Refuting Bloomberg's analysis: ChatGPT isn't racist, but ... by exe34 on Tuesday April 16, 2024 @05:47PM (#40057631)

It's for the reputation of the people passing the text off as their own or the LLM as their agent acting on their behalf.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Refuting Bloomberg's analysis: ChatGPT isn't racist, but ... by WalterBright on Tuesday April 16, 2024 @09:57PM (#40059616)

If people don't vet what they get from AI, it's their fault, not AI's.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Refuting Bloomberg's analysis: ChatGPT isn't racist, but ... by kelseyfrog on Wednesday April 17, 2024 @12:46AM (#40060521)

Whose fault it is is irrelevant. What is relevant is consequences. Folks are responsible for consequences of their decisions.

Drawing a line between those producing AI output and those consuming AI output is entirely arbitrary. Those producing AI content have a responsibility too. That's just basic human decency.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Refuting Bloomberg's analysis: ChatGPT isn't racist, but ... by WalterBright on Wednesday April 17, 2024 @03:21AM (#40061535)

Bowdlerized results are less useful/interesting to me. I'm not interested in pablum.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Refuting Bloomberg's analysis: ChatGPT isn't racist, but ... by kelseyfrog on Wednesday April 17, 2024 @09:28AM (#40064282)

I respect your honesty, but interestingness won't ever override responsibility.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Refuting Bloomberg's analysis: ChatGPT isn't racist, but ... by exe34 on Wednesday April 17, 2024 @03:33AM (#40061594)

We need to get you in charge of writing tabloid headlines!

[ Parent | on HN ]