News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PuTTY vulnerability vuln-p521-bias by some_furry on Monday April 15, 2024 @06:15PM (#40046316)
> This doesn't make 13 a power of two.

Where did I imply that it is?

> I'm aware of rejection sampling; my point was if you have a N bit value X and want M bits, truncating X to M bits and X MOD 2*M is the same.

Sure.

> Neither solve the problem where M > N, which is what TFA is about.

If you observe my other comments, you'll see I'm well aware of what the article is about.

Re:PuTTY vulnerability vuln-p521-bias by aidenn0 on Monday April 15, 2024 @06:23PM (#40046391)
> Where did I imply that it is?

You used 13 as an example in a response to my comment that was:

Isn't modulo the same as truncation when dealing with powers of two?

Re:PuTTY vulnerability vuln-p521-bias by some_furry on Monday April 15, 2024 @06:57PM (#40046623)
> You used 13 as an example

I don't see the number 13 in any of my comments on this thread (except this one, or where I quoted you). Perhaps you are confusing me with someone else?

Re:PuTTY vulnerability vuln-p521-bias by aidenn0 on Monday April 15, 2024 @07:32PM (#40046836)
Ah yes, that was lambdafu