Re:Linux fu: getting started with systemd
by starkruzr on Sunday April 14, 2024 @09:33PM
(#40036211)
many of the things it replaced were not "perfectly functional" in many respects.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Linux fu: getting started with systemd
by kingspact on Sunday April 14, 2024 @11:40PM
(#40036873)
They most certainly were. Unix has been fine being the backbone of the Internet since day one without systemd.
Re:Linux fu: getting started with systemd
by constantcrying on Monday April 15, 2024 @04:29AM
(#40038098)
What system that systemd replaced was so bad that it needed to be replaced by the init system.
I am not against new software, but if using a new piece of software, requires replacing dozens of other system components, then something is going very wrong.
The thought process behind people at Redhat who think "We need a new system logger, you know the init system is the perfect place to develop that" is just inexplicable to me.
Re:Linux fu: getting started with systemd
by PlutoIsAPlanet on Tuesday April 16, 2024 @11:30AM
(#40053298)
I believe the only other systemd components required for systemds service manager are journalctl and udev.
for relatively obvious reasons