Re:Personal VPN Services are Snake-Oil
by username135 on Sunday April 14, 2024 @05:11PM
(#40034516)
Why is your assumption that VPN traffic is being blocked because it's malicious?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
If you read carefully, you may see that they did not say that "VPN traffic is being blocked because it's malicious"
Re:Personal VPN Services are Snake-Oil
by jonathantf2 on Sunday April 14, 2024 @08:04PM
(#40035675)
Because I've hosted websites where blocking datacentre IPs has caused a massive reduction in spam and malicious activity - and tried to use Google search with Mullvad dialled only to be greeted by a CAPTCHA every other search.
As someone who operated a high fraud target during the pandemic, I am comfortable asserting that while not all commercial VPN traffic is fraudulent or malicious, most fraudulent or malicious traffic is over VPN.
Re:Personal VPN Services are Snake-Oil
by SkyPuncher on Sunday April 14, 2024 @06:08PM
(#40034904)
Because it absolutely is.
I occasionally fire up Mullvad when I’m on the go. I get blocked way more often when I use it
Re:Personal VPN Services are Snake-Oil
by hsbauauvhabzb on Sunday April 14, 2024 @06:19PM
(#40034976)
Because people run crawlers and perform illegal activity, and/or because ‘security companies’ sell the IP lists as low reputation potentially malicious IPs?
It's the same with any broker service. Fire up a Hurricane Electric IPv6 tunnel for the same effect.
Anyone who has browsed through one of these personal VPN services - or even a DIY VPN from a datacentre IP - for more than about 10 minutes will have experienced the increase in captcha's.
>Anyone who has browsed through one of these personal VPN services - or even a DIY VPN from a datacentre IP - for more than about 10 minutes will have experienced the increase in captcha's.
So has anyone behind random CGNAT.