Re:Harmful 5G Fast Lanes Are Coming; the FCC Needs to Stop Them
by 310260 on Saturday April 13, 2024 @01:19PM
(#40024530)
This is correct. Slicing can offer significant performance gains in certain situations. For example, lower latency when certain users need it while not overburdening the network by having to give that to every user.
Re:Harmful 5G Fast Lanes Are Coming; the FCC Needs to Stop Them
by _pigpen__ on Saturday April 13, 2024 @06:32PM
(#40026783)
So surprised I had to scroll too far for this reply. I actually work for one of the major US carriers. My job is literally to figure out how to apply the technical capabilities of 5G to solve business problems. NONE of the US carriers have figured out how to actually deliver network slicing beyond, say, reserving capacity for first responders. And, as you say, it’s about capacity, not speed per se. We want to make sure that, say, an AGV can offload kinematics to the MEC and navigate in real time in dynamic environments. The poster child for network slicing is the surgeon doing telesurgery over a 5G network (But that’s likely to remain a poster child). We’re figuring out how to provide network slices for autonomous vehicles, mobile teleoperation, etc., in all use cases we’re examining it because something BAD could happen absent guaranteed capacity. I have never ever heard anyone talk about using network slicing for QoS for consumer apps.
Re:Harmful 5G Fast Lanes Are Coming; the FCC Needs to Stop Them
by m0dest on Monday April 15, 2024 @10:42AM
(#40041206)
iOS 17 added explicit support for 5G slicing for QoS in consumer apps:
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/network/nwparamete...
Android 14 added 5G slicing upsell for consumer apps: https://source.android.com/docs/core/connect/5g-slicing#5g-s...
This is imminent.
Still, zero-rating and traffic shaping should not be used to favor apps, especially not on a pay to play basis, for all the same net neutrality arguments as ever.