News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:350 tons of of chocolate and wine arrive on world’s large... by thejohnconway on Saturday April 13, 2024 @11:05AM (#40023593)
Scale and throughput. Ships used to have cranes on deck and unload this way (look at pretty much any ocean liner, they had cranes on the forded for cargo). Containerisation improved throughput considerably, but added to latency. There is no way this is cheaper. Way more crew per tonne, the ship itself is almost certainly way more expensive for it capacity, and so on.

Not that I don’t think sailing is a bad way to move cargo, but I suspect if it does work, it won’t be small boats with crew.

Re:350 tons of of chocolate and wine arrive on world’s large... by krisoft on Saturday April 13, 2024 @01:55PM (#40024764)
> Containerisation improved throughput considerably, but added to latency.

I doubt the “added latency” part. How long do you think it takes to unload 11,000 twenty-foot container from a ship? Do you think anyone would move the contained stuff faster if it were just in a loose pile?

Re:350 tons of of chocolate and wine arrive on world’s large... by thejohnconway on Saturday April 13, 2024 @07:06PM (#40027039)
That used crates, but yes I think it way quicker per ship, because ocean liners in particular wanted fast turnaround times. A lot more labour was involved, obviously.
Re:350 tons of of chocolate and wine arrive on world’s large... by krisoft on Saturday April 13, 2024 @08:54PM (#40027710)
> yes I think it way quicker per ship, because ocean liners in particular wanted fast turnaround times

But container ships also want fast turnaround times. This is not a convincing argument.