Re:XZ backdoor story – Initial analysis
by ogurechny on Saturday April 13, 2024 @01:34AM
(#40020765)
People are so used to see artificial bureaucratic structures as more real than their real counterparts that they constantly invent such naive solutions. “Just make the gub'ment provide an official paper (with a stamp) that Joe Random Dude is a real developer, a father of two, not a fan of satanic metal music, and the project will be safe”.
Re:XZ backdoor story – Initial analysis
by xcrunner529 on Sunday April 14, 2024 @01:05AM
(#40028797)
People already do this in a general sense for authenticating a person and deciding if they’re trustworthy.
Not “trustworthy”, but “able to play their role in certain scenes”. When you're outside of that structure, those decorated clothes lose any meaning.
The VPN is just part of the picture (sock puppet accounts complaining about speed of dev, no meaningful history of other contributions from the dev, no trusted "personal network" for the dev, etc) that in hindsight should have raised red flags.
new project idea: OpenBackgroundCheck
volunteer osint researchers attempt to dox any identity you submit, so you can know whether they're the Right Kind of OSS contributor or not.
/s
Re:XZ backdoor story – Initial analysis
by xcrunner529 on Sunday April 14, 2024 @01:05AM
(#40028795)
If they constantly are on a VPN and not willing to disclose a real location or IP then I fail to see why they should be trusted when they don’t provide anything trustworthy themselves.
Fair.
> This person/team used a VPN. Masking your location is a big red flag for just dev work like this. These things could be exposed in UI.
I disagree strongly, and am surprised to hear this argument on Hacker News of all places.