Re:DNS over Wikipedia
by thaumasiotes on Friday April 12, 2024 @09:26AM
(#40012514)
If they're spreading disinformation, obviously they also aren't accurately representing their own speech patterns. That's just common sense.
Re:DNS over Wikipedia
by joshuaissac on Friday April 12, 2024 @09:43AM
(#40012777)
> If they're spreading disinformation, obviously they also aren't accurately representing their own speech patterns.
But GP is not documenting the 'true' speech patterns of the people spreading the disinformation, but rather the speech patterns they use when they are spreading disinformation (which, as you pointed out, might be different from their normal speech pattern). So the sources are still good enough for that.
I am making a research project on grammatical gender in French, that I host on Wikiversity (there is a dedicated research space there). Lately I get an increasingly large number of rejection of saving my contributions, because some sites are considered "unreliable sources". But in my project, I am looking to document what people use in practice in their written exchanges. That they express lies or try to spread disinformation is irrelevant from the linguistic perspective Iām conducting this project. But due to this software enforced policy, I get prevented from documenting my sources from time to time.