Re:Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury ...
by fauigerzigerk on Thursday April 11, 2024 @05:14AM
(#40000088)
Yes, but how do you prove that it was after one of the teams publishes their work? It seems nearly impossible.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury ...
by spion on Thursday April 11, 2024 @05:46AM
(#40000327)
You can use the "dropping a hash" method (patio11 has used this). As you progress your work, you publish a hash of it using a service trusted by everyone to correctly identify the researchers and timestamp their hashes.
If someone publishes the paper, you can then publish the files that resulted with the dropped hash and therefore prove you had certain progress of the work at a certain time.
Re:Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury ...
by arthurcolle on Thursday April 11, 2024 @05:58AM
(#40000393)
4d merkle trees etched on a proton or something
Re:Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury ...
by fauigerzigerk on Thursday April 11, 2024 @06:29AM
(#40000616)
Yes you can provably document your progress, but it doesn't solve the problem that someone else may have published overlapping ideas earlier and you can't prove that you didn't read what they published.
Re:Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury ...
by Leherenn on Thursday April 11, 2024 @09:32AM
(#40001953)
I was mostly thinking in the case of overlapping research as mentioned in the parent comment, not independent research years after the publication (where indeed it sounds impossible to prove you didn't read it).
Basically, if you could show that you had already made significant progress before the publication date, then you might be granted the patent as well.
Re:Amazon owes $525M in cloud-storage patent fight, US jury ...
by datascienced on Thursday April 11, 2024 @06:28AM
(#40000612)
a use for blockchain at last?