News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:One year of using an Apple Watch Ultra as a phone replace... by zamadatix on Wednesday April 10, 2024 @06:00AM (#39988907)
As the article says you already shouldn't need your phone on for calls to forward with the ultra (may not have been true with the series 4 as you say, never had one). You do need it for other apps like slack notifications to work right and I don't see that changing.
Re:One year of using an Apple Watch Ultra as a phone replace... by MrJagil on Wednesday April 10, 2024 @07:44AM (#39989597)
Do you have an official source? I think the article is wrong.
Re:One year of using an Apple Watch Ultra as a phone replace... by peterxjang on Wednesday April 10, 2024 @09:01AM (#39990226)
Author here - I haven't tested using calls with my phone off, my understanding is it should work if you have wifi-calling enabled (from the first footnote here https://support.apple.com/en-us/108300, there's a discussion here where people got it to work https://discussions.apple.com/thread/252472503?sortBy=best). You are correct though that the phone needs to be turned on to send and receive text messages, I'll update the article accordingly.

And I agree with you that AirPods connecting to the wrong device is incredibly frustrating. It happens to me when I have my phone with me when both my phone and watch are unlocked, but it doesn't seem to happen at all when my phone is locked and under my desk. You can also turn off AirPods automatic switching, but not sure how well that works if you want it on between the watch and a laptop but not a phone.

Re:One year of using an Apple Watch Ultra as a phone replace... by zamadatix on Wednesday April 10, 2024 @12:10PM (#39992320)
My experience matches the articles calling claims, though I don't intentionally try to go without my phone I just left it at home on a work trip once and it lost charge halfway through.