News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TSMC Gets $11.6B in US Grants, Loans for Three Chip Fabs by CharlieDigital on Monday April 08, 2024 @09:18AM (#39969431)
Per your first link, the US is below the OECD average with a -13 delta from 2018
Re:TSMC Gets $11.6B in US Grants, Loans for Three Chip Fabs by natnat on Monday April 08, 2024 @10:02AM (#39969810)
The PISA scores are below average in 2022 but not significantly so. Most countries have had a pretty bad decline in test scores due to covid, but that's (hopefully) a one-time problem and future cohorts will do better.

I'm not saying that's a good thing. We're a very rich country and we should do better.

But the US also has a lot of systematic problems that peer countries don't, like child poverty, that are likely a bigger cause of subpar test scores than bad schools.

Re:TSMC Gets $11.6B in US Grants, Loans for Three Chip Fabs by CharlieDigital on Monday April 08, 2024 @10:37AM (#39970189)
There's a difference between "below average and rising" versus "below average and falling". The US, over this period, happens to be the latter: below average and falling.

Merely focusing on "below average" without acknowledging the trend -- declining -- seems to be disingenuous.

Re:TSMC Gets $11.6B in US Grants, Loans for Three Chip Fabs by calderarrow on Monday April 08, 2024 @09:23AM (#39969476)
That section is just for mathematics, which the commenter specifically called out. The reading and science are above average
Re:TSMC Gets $11.6B in US Grants, Loans for Three Chip Fabs by newshackr on Monday April 08, 2024 @09:30AM (#39969540)
Above average seems like a low bar if the US wants to stay the top economy.
Re:TSMC Gets $11.6B in US Grants, Loans for Three Chip Fabs by natnat on Monday April 08, 2024 @09:52AM (#39969725)
I'm not trying to say that the US educational performance is great, just that it's not terrible. I think there's a lot of room for improvement, but there's a narrative that US schools are failing horribly and that just isn't true.
Re:TSMC Gets $11.6B in US Grants, Loans for Three Chip Fabs by CharlieDigital on Monday April 08, 2024 @10:02AM (#39969811)
Wouldn't you agree that "failing" is relative? Given just how much money the US has, wouldn't you agree that we should expect better outcomes? Wouldn't it be a failure that despite our massive wealth, we are below OECD average in any subject?
Re:TSMC Gets $11.6B in US Grants, Loans for Three Chip Fabs by shepherdjerred on Monday April 08, 2024 @10:56AM (#39970423)
That is a _huge_ shift of the goalpost from "US is worse than third world countries"
Re:TSMC Gets $11.6B in US Grants, Loans for Three Chip Fabs by dahfizz on Monday April 08, 2024 @11:12AM (#39970573)
Wildly shifting goal posts from “worse than third world” to “above average isn’t good enough”
Re:TSMC Gets $11.6B in US Grants, Loans for Three Chip Fabs by CharlieDigital on Monday April 08, 2024 @09:37AM (#39969584)
Particularly so given how "wealthy" the US is.
Re:TSMC Gets $11.6B in US Grants, Loans for Three Chip Fabs by maxerickson on Monday April 08, 2024 @09:27AM (#39969510)
For math. Above average in reading and science.

There's also the matter of picking a definition for third world.

Re:TSMC Gets $11.6B in US Grants, Loans for Three Chip Fabs by Thorrez on Monday April 08, 2024 @09:49AM (#39969696)
Does OECD include third world?