Not OP but if the costs were a function of the wealth (highly nonlinear, such as exponential) then a large company would need to think twice before going to court.

This also means that the smaller players wood get drained out if they try to abuse the system.

Another thing is that the CEO wild be forced to attend, or have very high costs to not be there. This is too ensure that me, as an individual, have much more to loose personally (and can be exhausted) in front of a corporation who has leaders wise job is to be at the court.

I did not put a lot of thoughts on the ideas, but the basic one is too make everyone suffer the same relatively.

This is partly sourced from Finland roads, where you pay in function of your wealth when you cross the law