News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:More Agents Is All You Need: LLMs performance scales with... by ben_w on Sunday April 07, 2024 @07:21AM (#39960049)
Unknown for the actual largest due to secrecy; 1% for the largest public models… but also organic ones are definitely a bit different from digital ones, and the jury is still out if those differences matter and if so by how much.

The comparison would therefore be with a mid-sized rodent, horse, or raven rather than a human.

(But even that's misleading, because the LLM doesn't have to use tokens to represent "contract left supracoracoideus" and "lay egg").

Re:More Agents Is All You Need: LLMs performance scales with... by samus on Sunday April 07, 2024 @10:01AM (#39960829)
Tokens aren't a necessary differentiator here. There is no fundamental technical reason why tokenization is used, it just has certain practical advantages. And the distinction almost disappears when we look at multimodal transformers, which process images, audio, and video broken apart into sequences of blocks of binary data.
Re:More Agents Is All You Need: LLMs performance scales with... by ben_w on Sunday April 07, 2024 @02:13PM (#39962543)
There's no reason for any specific tokenisation, but the Transformer always has some tokenisation.

Tokens are allowed to be blocks of pixels, for example. No reason we couldn't have a token be a specific muscle or sensory nerve.

What I'm saying is that Large Language Models don't have a body, so no nerves and muscles to have to be represented within them; conversely, organic life does have those things and thus organic brains must spend some of their complexity on those things.

This means they have the possibility to equal us for language even with no capacity for vision, walking, tying shoelaces, or playing catch.