Re:Hertz's Bet on Teslas Went Horribly Sideways
by dazc on Thursday April 04, 2024 @11:44AM
(#39931868)
There was a business in the UK doing this but didn't work out any cheaper than a regular rental from Enterprise. Economy of scale at such a level is hard to beat.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Hertz's Bet on Teslas Went Horribly Sideways
by KennyBlanken on Thursday April 04, 2024 @11:56AM
(#39932064)
It's not economy of scale - they get to write off depreciation at a much higher rate than the cars actually depreciate.
This is true of all businesses and all capital. It's a great big tax cheat, centered around companies getting to claim that their capital is worthless after just a few years.
Re:Hertz's Bet on Teslas Went Horribly Sideways
by votepaunchy on Thursday April 04, 2024 @12:25PM
(#39932533)
How is this a “tax cheat” and not simply a tax deferral? Businesses can deduct expenses, and accelerated depreciation is not increased depreciation.
Re:Hertz's Bet on Teslas Went Horribly Sideways
by IshKebab on Thursday April 04, 2024 @12:28PM
(#39932586)
How would that actually help long term though? Imagine they write off their entire entire fleet in 1 year. Yes they pay less tax that year, but in future years when they sell their old cars that are worth nothing for lots of money they'll have a load of extra tax to pay.
I can see how it lets you move tax around in time a bit but that's it (and it's often allowed explicitly anyway).
Am I missing something or is this the common "tax write-off = magical money" misunderstanding?