NASA, Lockheed Martin Working to Resolve Artemis II Orion Issues

Re:NASA, Lockheed Martin Working to Resolve Artemis II Orion... by sabareesh on Thursday April 04, 2024 @12:06AM (#39926427)

I believe again we are shortsighted here, it is not about just going back to moon but it is to establish as base. Based on wikipedia starship can take 100 tons to Moon after several refueling, which makes sense. We have already had our boots on the Moon why do you want to do the same again with almost no value of doing so after spending several billion dollars

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NASA, Lockheed Martin Working to Resolve Artemis II Orion... by throwawaymaths on Thursday April 04, 2024 @02:27PM (#39934128)

Nobody is disputing 100 tons to moon capability is worth investing in. The plan though is to use starship for the first manned landing. Even that would be way less insane if you could get away with just parking an expendable starship in orbit around the moon, or deorbiting it or something and get away with fewer refuelings for the first landing. But that's not the plan.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NASA, Lockheed Martin Working to Resolve Artemis II Orion... by sabareesh on Friday April 05, 2024 @03:35PM (#39946225)

Did you say first manned landing ?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NASA, Lockheed Martin Working to Resolve Artemis II Orion... by throwawaymaths on Saturday April 06, 2024 @01:51PM (#39954096)

First crewed landing of the Artemis program. Am I wrong about that?

[ Parent | on HN ]