That would be a most temporary ownership I should think. Inherently unstable countries tend to get rid of the rulers at a high frequency than stable ones.

Unless you have the military power to maintain dictatorship and money to buy the protection of a superpower.

But even then it is tenuous.

Taking over a stable country would be far easier in the long term. Yet when stable countries undergo major change, they tend to gravitate towards unstableness.

Papa Doc and Baby Doc ruled Haiti for 2 generations...