News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reflections on Distrusting xz by MattPalmer1086 on Wednesday April 03, 2024 @07:32AM (#39916067)
Nation state actor is a standard info sec term. Using it does not imply any kind of wizardry.

Edit: most threat actors do not have the patience or the motive to behave in this way. It is reasonable to suppose that this is a nation state actor.

Re:Reflections on Distrusting xz by XorNot on Wednesday April 03, 2024 @08:02AM (#39916330)
There are organised crime networks which buy 0-days to run ransomware, and actively target companies to do it.

Why couldn't this be an attempt at finding or selling exploit access on the black market?

The problem here is no one is looking properly at the scope. It's more then trivial so everyone is leaping for "nation-state" as though that's the only threat actor with motivation and patience.

Re:Reflections on Distrusting xz by MattPalmer1086 on Wednesday April 03, 2024 @08:40PM (#39925182)
Granted, other threat actors remain a possibility, there is no proof.

It looks like the sort of thing nation states would do and develop. It could be some other group hoping to make money as you say.

Whoever they are, they seem to have good opsec, over multiple years.

Re:Reflections on Distrusting xz by HelloNurse on Wednesday April 03, 2024 @09:20AM (#39917099)
It's also a term that implies the competent, official hacking departments or espionage agencies of that country, rather than government-supported amateurs (e.g. an untrained policeman) or generic people from that country.