News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Redict 7.3.0, a copyleft fork of Redis, is now available by drewdevault on Wednesday April 03, 2024 @07:27AM (#39916025)
>So I'm clear though - if I wrote a SAAS product tomorrow that under the covers used Redis, I'm OK, but if I spun up a bunch of servers and offered managed Redis as a product, I would need to pay?

That's the pitch of the license, essentially, but in practice the SSPL is an utter nightmare to comply with (to the point of being deliberate) and it mainly exists to put a veneer of open source on a proprietary product. In actual practice you really just cannot offer Redis as a service unless you are Redis Ltd, which is the actual point of the license in the end.

Re:Redict 7.3.0, a copyleft fork of Redis, is now available by umanwizard on Wednesday April 03, 2024 @07:45AM (#39916176)
> In actual practice you really just cannot offer Redis as a service unless you are Redis Ltd

Isn’t this exactly what the person you’re replying to was saying?

Re:Redict 7.3.0, a copyleft fork of Redis, is now available by drewdevault on Wednesday April 03, 2024 @07:54AM (#39916259)
Yes, I realize I worded this poorly. I emphasized this point because this is what makes it non-free/not meet the Open Source Definition; you cannot retain exclusive right to commercialization. But I realize that was not actually something the parent commenter was asking about.