Re:What we know about the xz Utils backdoor that almost infe...
by dartos on Monday April 01, 2024 @11:24AM
(#39895123)
I mean Okta has shown us that paying for closed source does not imply higher quality or more secure software.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What we know about the xz Utils backdoor that almost infe...
by acdha on Monday April 01, 2024 @12:51PM
(#39896178)
Also F5 or Citrix: some of their core security products had 90s-style C exploits and other signs of development practices well behind the times - roughly at the level of going to surgery and seeing your surgeon not washing their hands in the bathroom.
https://www.cisa.gov/guidance-addressing-citrix-netscaler-ad...
https://www.mandiant.com/resources/blog/session-hijacking-ci...
https://www.fortinet.com/blog/threat-research/defending-agai...
https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa...
Re:What we know about the xz Utils backdoor that almost infe...
by bongodongobob on Monday April 01, 2024 @12:35PM
(#39896009)
Yeah I'm not implying that's the way to go, but thinking since something open source was compromised that it will encourage businesses to donate is wishful thinking.