Re:What we know about the xz Utils backdoor that almost infe...
by Denvercoder9 on Monday April 01, 2024 @09:20AM
(#39893895)
Arch, Gentoo and openSUSE Tumbleweed are hardly the world.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What we know about the xz Utils backdoor that almost infe...
by samtheprogram on Monday April 01, 2024 @10:34AM
(#39894562)
Arch and Gentoo were also not supported, although the code shipped, because the exploit explicitly checked for RPM- and deb-packaged distros.
Suse is RPM based, but don’t remember whether the check was for the utilities or another method — Suse uses zypper for package management, as opposed to yum/dnf on the far more popular RedHat-based distros, so it depends how the exploit checked.
Re:What we know about the xz Utils backdoor that almost infe...
by jwilk on Monday April 01, 2024 @11:34AM
(#39895260)
The initial advisory (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39865810) said it was:
test "x$RPM_ARCH" = "xx86_64"