News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What we know about the xz Utils backdoor that almost infe... by otherme123 on Monday April 01, 2024 @07:19AM (#39892906)
I guess the blame is on the people who decide to depend on a very small (by team size at least) project: https://xkcd.com/2347/ . While having plenty of safer alternatives.

Lets suppose I create a personal and hobby project. Suddenly RedHat, Debian, Amazon, Google... you name it, decide to put my project as a fundamental dependency of their toolchain, without giving me at least some support in the form of trustable developers. The more cautious I would be is to shut down the project entirely or abandon it, but more probably I would have fallen to Jia Tan tricks.

Also, the phone call and even a face to face meeting wouldn't give you extra security. In what scenario a phone conversation with Jia would expose him, or would make you suspicious enough to not delegate?

Re:What we know about the xz Utils backdoor that almost infe... by mi_lk on Monday April 01, 2024 @07:24AM (#39892940)
> While having plenty of safer alternatives

What are xz's safer alternatives? And how do you make sure of that?

Re:What we know about the xz Utils backdoor that almost infe... by edward28 on Monday April 01, 2024 @09:15AM (#39893848)
Zstd because Facebook is looking out for our best interests.