Re:Xz: Can you spot the single character that disabled Linux...
by josefx on Sunday March 31, 2024 @12:42PM
(#39885766)
The goal is to figure out if the optional features work at all. For that a system you control is required.
That the sabotage worked at all relied on the fact that nobody was testing those features.
How secure is a sandbox that may not even exist? Apparently its good enough for most.
The problem here wasn’t the concept of feature detection but that it was sabotaged by someone trusted and easily missed in the noise of other work. What was needed was someone very carefully reviewing that commit or build output to notice that the lockdown feature was being disabled on systems where it was fully enabled, and we already know that maintainer time was in short supply. Any other approach would likely have failed because the attacker would have used the same plausible sounding language to explain why it needed to be a complicated dynamic check.