News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl... by lazyasciiart on Sunday March 31, 2024 @04:55AM (#39882588)
How do you mean?
Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl... by rigid on Sunday March 31, 2024 @05:21AM (#39882701)
I bet in the majority of cases, there's no need to pressure for merging.

In a big company it's much easier to slip it in. Code seemingly less relevant for security is often not reviewed by a lot of people. Also, often people don't really care and just sign it off without a closer look.

And when it's merged, no one will ever look at it again, other than with FOSS.

Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl... by sylware on Sunday March 31, 2024 @07:10AM (#39883186)
I think you nailed it.
Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl... by yborg on Sunday March 31, 2024 @03:19PM (#39887193)
An insider could just be tasked to look for exploitable vulnerabilities in existing code and compile this information for outside entities without ever having to risk inserting a purpose-made backdoor. Considering the security state of most large codebases, there would be a bottomless well of them.
Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl... by 91bananas on Tuesday April 02, 2024 @12:43PM (#39907832)
Who wants this job, that is capable of actually doing it properly?
Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl... by lodovic on Sunday March 31, 2024 @07:35AM (#39883300)
I've read about workplaces that were compromised with multiple people - they would hire a compromised manager, who would then install one or two developers, and shape the environment for them to prevent discovery, which would make these kind of exploits trivial.
Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl... by leeoniya on Sunday March 31, 2024 @09:37AM (#39884126)
so, Office Space?